By Nathanael

Impeachment is only a political act with limited consequences that bear one’s ability to retain or hold elected office. The convicted Party (such as the President or Judge or Congressperson) of an Impeachment is still liable and subject to Indictment and prosecution for any criminal acts according to Law.

There is no language in the Constitution or the US Code that requires an impeachment proceeding to come before a criminal indictment or prosecution. Any Constitutional Scholar, retired Assistant US Attorney, Supreme Court Justice, Attorney General, Congressperson or any Court stating such prior constraint is in violation of the Constitution and the Law. No one is above the law, not even the President. The Constitution cannot be altered by statute, a legislative act, a bill passed by Congress and signed by the President or an Executive Order. A valid Article V procedure must be accomplished before the Constitution is lawfully modified.

UNITED STATES CODE - TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I – CRIMES, CHAPTER 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 2. Principals

(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.
(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.

After Ms. de la Vega has taken up her responsibility by filing her criminal complaint, she has other serious crimes to attest and allege against the President and others. These perpetrators have confessed to these crimes by their public actions. Just prior to the November 2006 election cycle, Congress passed and the President signed the Military Commissions Act of 2006.

One aspect of this supposed “Act of Congress” retroactively holds people criminally liable for certain actions that happened before the bill was passed by Congress and signed by GWBush. The Military Commissions Act of 2006 is a direct violation of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, and Paragraph 3, is constitutionally null and void and of no force and effect.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

“All laws repugnant to the Constitution are void of law.”
Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison (1803)

A challenge to any and all attorneys, including retired Assistant US Attorneys … please explain why the members of Congress who voted for the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and the President who signed it supposedly into law are not guilty of rebellion or sedition and other related crimes?

18 USC CHAPTER 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

Sec. 2383. Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

The Military Commission Act of 2006 has been veiled in the appearance of law when in fact it is a criminal act. The presentation of an invalid, unlawful act as being a valid law is known as acting under the color of law. It is a gross and intentional misrepresentation that is not law but tyranny. It is a serious enough violation of the rights of the people that the potential consequences include capital punishment.

UNITED STATES CODE - TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART 1 - CRIMES, CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS

� 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

UNITED STATES CODE - TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART 1 - CRIMES, CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS

� 241. Conspiracy against rights

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Ms de la Vega also adds to her responsibilities to We the People by making additional assertions in a bold and accurate statement found in part 1.

George W. Bush exploited the vulnerability of an entire populace reeling from the September 11, 2001, attacks to manipulate them into supporting a war based on false pretenses.

The President has in all likelihood committed War Crimes under USC Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 18, Section 2441 for his Iraq War. If she truly believes her above statement, then she must attest and affirm to these criminal actions of GWBush et al in another criminal complaint.

There is one last question to Ms. de la Vega. If GWBush were monstrous enough to use the 911 attacks as a false pretense to commit war crimes against Iraq, then why would it be unreasonable to consider the 911 attacks as a false flag action perpetrated by internal terrorists? The resultant blood rage of the people could then be manipulated into a war footing against Iraq.

I suggest that you read and consider the works of Morgan Reynolds, Judy Wood, Jim Fetzer and Rick Siegel before answering that question.

Luke 11:45-46 NASB

(45) One of the lawyers said to Him in reply, “Teacher, when You say this, You insult us too.”
(46) But He said, “Woe to you lawyers as well! For you weigh men down with burdens hard to bear, while you yourselves will not even touch the burdens with one of your fingers.

Ephesians 5:11-13 NASB

(11) Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them;
(12) for it is disgraceful even to speak of the things which are done by them in secret.
(13) But all things become visible when they are exposed by the light, for everything that becomes visible is light.

Galatians 4:16 NASB

So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?

Related Article: Conspiracy of War Criminals… GWBush and Congress
“Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact.”