Mission Control wrote this in the wee hours:
Source: ImpeachPAC
While impeachment is a very serious step that should not have been trivialized the way it was during the last presidential administration, it is also an indispensable part of a system of checks and balances that sustains our democracy. When strong evidence exists of the most serious crimes, we must use impeachment or lose the ability of the legislative branch to compell the executive branch to obey the law.
This is not a question of supporting one party over another, but of upholding the rule of law over both of them. The Democrats will resist impeachment of Bush and Cheney as fiercely as the Republicans until the people of the country force it on them. And we are not doing so to promote a party, but to protect our democracy.
Our democracy and the values we uphold are endangered. Open government has been replaced by secrecy. The rule of law has become the rule of the presidential signing statement in which one man rewrites the laws passed by our elected representatives.
Bush and Cheney have seized powers that belong to Congress, and have done so by intentionally misleading Congress and the American people about the fictional threat from Iraq, about spying on us without court approval, about torturing, and about shredding our civil liberties.
The following charges warrant impeachment proceedings:
1-Intentionally misleading Congress and the public regarding the threat from Iraq in order to justify a war against Iraq, and intentionally conspiring with others to defraud Congress in this regard. These actions are not just criminal in a rhetorical sense. They are felonies, violating the federal anti-conspiracy statute and the False Statements Accountability Act.
More on these crimes: http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/5
Evidence that Bush knew his statements were false: http://www.davidswanson.org/?q=node/474
2-Ordering the National Security Agency to conduct electronic surveillance of American citizens without seeking warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, as required by law, specifically, Title 50 United States Code, Section 1805. Bush has openly confessed to this crime but claims to have the right as president to commit it. The right of a president to secretly violate the laws of Congress, while lying to the public about it, does not exist in the US Constitution. The right of the same president to continue his criminal behavior after it’s discovered is also not to be found in US law.
3-Conspiring to commit the torture of prisoners. Bush and Cheney say they do not torture. The evidence overwhelmingly says otherwise. This crime violates the “Federal Torture Act” Title 18 United States Code, Section 113C. It also violates the UN Torture Convention and the Geneva Convention, which are U.S. law under Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, which makes treaties ratified by the US part of US law.
4-Ordering indefinite detention without access to legal counsel, without charge, and without the opportunity to appear before a civil judicial officer to challenge the detention, all in violation of U.S. law and the Bill of Rights.
For complete text as well as more information on other talking points, go here and here.
Read More in Our Must Read Section
Approximately a year ago, I wrote in this magazine that President George W. Bush had committed high crimes and misdemeanors and should be impeached and removed from office. His impeachable offenses include using lies and deceptions to drive the country into war in Iraq, deliberately and repeatedly violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) on wiretapping in the United States, and facilitating the mistreatment of US detainees in violation of the Geneva Conventions and the War Crimes Act of 1996.
Since then, the case against President Bush has, if anything, been strengthened by reports that he personally authorized CIA abuse of detainees. In addition, courts have rejected some of his extreme assertions of executive power. The Supreme Court ruled that the Geneva Conventions apply to the treatment of detainees, and a federal judge ruled that the President could not legally ignore FISA. Even Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’s recent announcement that the wiretapping program would from now on operate under FISA court supervision strongly suggests that Bush’s prior claims that it could not were untrue.
Filed under: Blog, Evidence, Evidence Overview, In the News, Impeachment Strategy, Constitutional Crisis
Considering the Bush administration’s assault on our civil rights, the Constitution itself, American principles as we know it and rampant republican cronyism, there is no shortage of books to read that outline the worst Presidency in American history. In fact, there is a literal litany of them to read and depress one’s self over it all. The problem with such a plethora to pick from is you can’t read them all and many of them are either too dry, histrionic or too full of legal blather to bother with.
1 Comment