'?> mission:impeachable

Cheney is Impeachment Bait

Mission Control wrote this in the late evening:

by Allen L. Roland

Libby and his mentor Paul Wolfowitz laid out the case for the illegal invasion of Iraq just one week after the Twin Towers fell in 2001 ~ and both reported to Dick Cheney.

Guy Dinsmore, Financial Times UK, profiled Libby and writes;

” Together with the vice-president, Mr. Libby launched the push to invade Iraq …. And, together with Cheney, Libby has “worked hard to block signs of engagement with Iran, resist direct talks with North Korea, and undermine U.S. legislation prohibiting torture and degrading treatment of detainees.”

As such, Libby was Cheney’s disciple and hit man and was obviously chosen to out Valerie Plame by Darth Vader himself ~ Dick Cheney.

Expect a Bush pardon and eventually a medal if Libby is found guilty. Loyalty to the chief outweighs everything in this den of thieves.

However, the last thing Cheney wants is now happening ~ Fitzgerald digging deeper into Cheney’s secret government and other more flagrant crimes against peace.

Read More at OpEdNews.com

Activists Call for Cheney’s Impeachment

by Allison Brophy Champion

Two political activists from Leesburg set up outside the Culpeper post office Tuesday afternoon to hand out literature and call for the impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney.

“Impeach Satan first,” said a poster hanging from their table, and at its center was a photo of Cheney with devil horns and a pitchfork. “Go with Larouche.”

“We’re out here to make sure everybody knows Dick Cheney is at the end of his rope,” said Gene Schenk, 52. “That we’ve got to stop Cheney from going to war with Iran.”

Both Schenk and co-activist, Leslie Vaughan, represented the political action committee of 84-year-old Lyndon LaRouche, a controversial political figure who has run, unsuccessfully, for president in every election since 1976. Vaughan declined to elaborate on her reasons for coming to Culpeper, saying, “Cheney is not a very nice man.”

Read More at the StarExponent

Lobbying for Impeachment

Mission Control wrote this in the late evening:

by David Swanson

It’s an honor to be part of this obviously growing movement for peace and justice. Our president took us into war before Congress gave its so-called authorization. He did so without telling Congress or the American people and without Congress appropriating any funds for the purpose. In the summer of 2002, Bush took $2.5 billion – according to the Congressional Research Service – away from other projects, including Afghanistan, and used it to build airfields in Qatar and to begin bombing Iraq in preparation for the full-scale invasion.

That is a crime.

In fact, it’s what the founders of this country would have called a high crime and misdemeanor.

And what do we do about high crimes and misdemeanors?

Our Department of so-called Defense has this kind of money lying around. And this is about the same amount of money that would be needed to bring our troops home in a safe and orderly manner. And if we persuade Congress to cut off funding to extend the war, it may be that Bush will bring our troops home without us having to impeach him. But when Congress found the nerve to cut off the funds for the Vietnam War, it was the pressure of impeachment that persuaded Nixon not to veto, and it was the pressure of the peace movement that drove impeachment forward. Impeachment helps end the war even if we never get all the way to impeachment.

Read More at the American Chronicle

A Case for Impeachment

Mission Control wrote this in the late evening:

by Robert Scheer

Not all lies are created equal. It is understood that there is a chasm of importance between little white lies and big black ones. Most would agree that lying about a consensual sexual affair, even by the president, is of significantly lesser concern than lying about the proliferation of nuclear weapons as an excuse to take the nation to war.

How then is it possible that a Republican-controlled Congress impeached President Bill Clinton over his attempt to conceal marital infidelity but that a Democratic-led Congress will not even consider impeaching this president for far more serious transgressions against the public trust? That is the question that arises from early revelations in the trial of Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff.This case’s importance lies not in the narrow charge that Libby committed perjury in testifying about his role in the outing of CIA operative Valerie Wilson; that was merely one facet of a far-ranging plot to deceive Congress and the public about perhaps the most important issue of our time: the prospect of terrorists obtaining a weapon of mass destruction.

Read More at Huffington Post and Truthdig

Bush Impeachment Poster Boy

Mission Control wrote this in the wee hours:

by Mick Youther

I know the Democratic leaders in Congress have said that impeachment is “off the table”, but that is one campaign promise that should not be kept. Oversight of the Bush Administration is not enough.

How do you oversee a torture program? How do you oversee “extraordinary renditions” and secret prisons? How do you oversee the destruction of the U.S. Constitution? What is Congress going to do when Bush starts bombing Iran–watch closely?

You don’t oversee these kinds of things. You stop them. That is why the Founding Fathers wrote impeachment into our Constitution.

The power of impeachment was one of the first proposals presented to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Founding Fathers felt it was important enough to mention it six times in the Constitution and once more in an amendment. They believed the new government needed a strong executive, but having just thrown off the rule of one King, they did not want another one–even an elected one.

Read More at OpEdNews.com

Cindy Headlines Impeachment Tour

Mission Control wrote this in the wee hours:

by Daniel Barlow

NEWFANE — Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan will headline a 10-town, three-day tour of Vermont in early March to raise support for a series of town meeting resolutions calling for the impeachment of President Bush and withdrawal of troops from Iraq.

Sheehan, who camped outside of Bush’s Texas ranch in 2005 after her soldier son was killed in Iraq, will join Newfane resident Dan DeWalt on the tour starting March 2. DeWalt kicked off a movement last year in Vermont to impeach Bush.

Between 30-50 towns are expected to have impeachment resolutions on their town meeting agenda this year and about 50 more could consider the question under the “other business” portion of the meeting, according to DeWalt, who said the movement has taken on a life of its own.

“When we voted to impeach Bush in Newfane last year we inspired a lot of people in Vermont,” said DeWalt, referring to the March 2006 town meeting season during which more than a half dozen towns in the state passed the measure. “But this has now become a true grassroots movement in the state.”

The tour, which might also feature author John Nichols, will stop in Montpelier, Middlebury, Burlington, Hardwick, St. Johnsbury, Rutland, Springfield, Manchester, Brattleboro and possibly Bradford or White River Junction.

Read More at the Rutland Herald

Peace in Los Angeles

Mission Control wrote this terribly early in the morning:

Photos by twerp

Maxine Reads Bush

Mission Control wrote this terribly early in the morning:

Where’s the I Word?

Mission Control wrote this terribly early in the morning:

by Dave Lindorff

The largely unstated word at the massive anti-war demonstration and march in Washington on Saturday was “impeachment.” Not that it wasn’t on demonstrators’ lips and signs, but it wasn’t coming from the podium.

The march, organized by United for Peace and Justice, was instead deliberately focused narrowly on the issue of ending the war in Iraq and preventing an invasion of Iran. But clearly, behind that was the sense that the US government is in the hands of a cabal of warmongers and anti-democratic usurpers who are intent on broadening the war in the Middle East, not ending it , and that the Democrats in the 110th Congress haven’t got the spine to stop them (a group from Seattle actually addressed this with a giant white spine float emblazoned with the words “investigate, impeach, indict”).

Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), the new head of the House Judiciary Committee, was a late addition to the roster of speakers at the rally on the National Mall. He told the cheering throng that while Bush may have been “firing the generals who tell him that we’re losing the war in Iraq,” he “can’t fire you.” Then he added, in a none-too-veiled hint that impeachment may be coming, “But we can fire him!”

The crowd went wild, with chants of “Impeach him!”

The stage has been set.

Read More at CounterPunch

Peace March Video

Mission Control wrote this terribly early in the morning:

More Videos

Why We Must Have Impeachment

Mission Control wrote this in the wee hours:

by Dave Lindorff

Let’s take the war in Iraq. The president clearly lied and tricked both the Congress and the American people into allowing him to invade that country. He and Vice President Dick Cheney carefully cherry-picked half-truths and known falsehoods to lay out as “evidence” that Saddam Hussein was developing nuclear weapons and that he was in league with Osama bin Laden. His White House orchestrated a campaign to damage the reputation of an honest critic, ambassador Joseph Wilson, who had discovered that a key piece of that “evidence” –some alleged documents from the country of Niger–had been forged, and even “outed” Wilson’s CIA-agent wife. These lies have led directly to the pointless deaths of nearly 3100 American men and women in uniform and to the deaths of perhaps hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi men, women and children. Bush also illegally pulled American troops and equipment out of Afghanistan, right at the height of a Congressionally authorized campaign to capture or kill bin Laden and his Al Qaeda organization (fatally crippling that effort), and sent them to the border of Iraq in preparation for his war there.

Read More at The Baltimore Chronicle

Kucinich Speaks of Impeachment

Mission Control wrote this late at night:

by Mike Sheehan

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) says the White House is “up to its old tricks” as it preps for a U.S. attack on Iran, according to a press release.

The 2008 Democratic presidential candidate warns that Bush’s actions could result in impeachment.

Kucinich accuses the Bush administration “of mounting a media blitz to prepare the U.S. public for an eventual attack on Iran,” according to the release, which cites a report that the President authorized the military to kill Iranians operating inside Iraq.

“The White House is up to its old tricks again,” says Kucinich, accusing the administration of “providing information by anonymous sources and portraying Iran as an aggressor in Iraq.” He continues, “The President is mischaracterizing U.S. action vis à vis Iran. In fact, the U.S. is already engaged in offensive and provocative acts against Iran.

“The President’s strategy, by portraying our involvement as only being on the defensive, is laying out the groundwork for him to attack Iran and bypass authorization by Congress.”

The six-term Congressmember, a long-time advocate for peace, blasts “the White House spin machine” for “providing justification for a new war … against Iran.” He adds, “The Washington Post is quoting strategically placed Administration sources who are providing justification for an attack… This new twist on Iran, a country this Administration refuses to have free and open diplomatic talks with, is stating the Administration’s case for war.”

Kucinich closes by warning, “The degree to which this President continues to take steps to go to war against Iran without consulting with the full Congress is the degree to which he is increasingly putting himself in jeopardy of an impeachment proceeding.”

The full release is available at Rep. Kucinich’s official site.

Read More at Raw Story

Back On Pelosi’s Table

Mission Control wrote this in the wee hours:

by John Nichols

The news from former vice presidential chief of staff “Scooter” Libby’s trial on charges of obstructing a federal investigation — particularly the revelation that Vice President Dick Cheney wrote a memo that effectively confirms his intimate involvement in strategizing about how to counter the inquiry into the Bush administration’s politically-motivated outing of CIA operative Valarie Plame — should slowly but surely edge the prospect of impeachment back onto the table from which Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi removed it.

Cheney is expected to testify in the Libby trial and, if a federal jury rejects his testimony as less than credible, that would seem to create an appropriate opening for members of the House who take seriously their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution to entertain a discussion of impeaching the vice president.

Intriguingly, Cheney almost found himself in the middle of the discussion this week.

Prior to CNN personality Wolf Blitzer’s testy-if-not-particularly substantive interview with the vice president on Wednesday, the network’s resident rabble rouser, commentator Jack Cafferty, presented a reasonably favorable feature on a move by New Mexico state Senators Jerry Ortiz y Pino, D-Albuquerque, and John Grubesic, D-Santa Fe, to get that state’s legislature to petition Congress to impeach both Cheney and Bush.

Read More at The Nation

VIDEO:



More Coverage:

Dave Lindorf: Conyers Puts Abuse of Power “On the Table”

Speaker Nancy Pelosi may have taken impeachment “off the table,” but House Judiciary Chair John Conyers (D-MI) is about to put it back on the menu.

Conyers may have been blocked by a timid Pelosi from initiating impeachment hearings immediately into President Bush’s crimes against the Constitution, but he’s taken the first step anyway, with the anouncement of plans to hold hearings into what is surely the President’s gravest abuse of power.

The congressman, a veteran of the Nixon impeachment hearings who recently published a book on Bush’s crimes, today announced plans to have his Judiciary Committee hold hearings on Bush’s rampant use of so-called “signing statements.” These are the documents the president has claimed give him the power, as a commander-in-chief, to ignore laws duly passed by the Congress.

Bush has used this bogus claim to ignore all or parts of some 1,200 laws
passed by Congress. He has done it willfully, and he has done it
deceptively, often adding the signing statement saying he will be ignoring a law after having first hosted a friendly photo-op signing session at which he offer no indication that he had any problem with a measure.

The first Judiciary Committee hearing is set for January 31.

Hopefully this will be followed by more Judiciary hearings into the president’s other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Readers should encourage Conyers in his efforts, and urge him to follow through, by sending messages of support to John Conyers.

source: BuzzFlash.com

No Remedy Short of Impeachment

Mission Control wrote this in the wee hours:

by Elizabeth Holtzman

Approximately a year ago, I wrote in this magazine that President George W. Bush had committed high crimes and misdemeanors and should be impeached and removed from office. His impeachable offenses include using lies and deceptions to drive the country into war in Iraq, deliberately and repeatedly violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) on wiretapping in the United States, and facilitating the mistreatment of US detainees in violation of the Geneva Conventions and the War Crimes Act of 1996.

Since then, the case against President Bush has, if anything, been strengthened by reports that he personally authorized CIA abuse of detainees. In addition, courts have rejected some of his extreme assertions of executive power. The Supreme Court ruled that the Geneva Conventions apply to the treatment of detainees, and a federal judge ruled that the President could not legally ignore FISA. Even Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’s recent announcement that the wiretapping program would from now on operate under FISA court supervision strongly suggests that Bush’s prior claims that it could not were untrue.

Despite scant attention from the mainstream media, since last year impeachment has won a wide audience. Amid a flurry of blogs, books and articles, a national grassroots movement has sprung up. In early December seventy-five pro-impeachment rallies were held around the country and pro-impeachment efforts are planned for Congressional districts across America. A Newsweek poll, conducted just before election day, showed 51 percent of Americans believed that impeachment of President Bush should be either a high or lower priority; 44 percent opposed it entirely. (Compare these results with the 63 percent of the public who in the fall of 1998 opposed President Clinton’s impeachment.) Most Americans understand the gravity of President Bush’s constitutional misconduct.

Read More at The Nation

Wisconsin’s Superior Daily Telegram Calls for Impeachment

Mission Control wrote this late at night:

The Superior Daily Telegram has called for the impeachment of President Bush. The Telegram is the first area paper to do that, and one of the first in Wisconsin.

Read More at BusinessNorth.com 

Impeachment Bill Faces Early Hurdles in New Mexico

Mission Control wrote this in the late evening:

by Steve Terrell

Two Democratic state senators on Tuesday introduced a resolution calling for impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, accusing the pair of misleading Congress over the Iraq war, torturing prisoners and violating Americans’ civil liberties.

New Mexico’s Legislature would be the first to pass an impeachment resolution.

But even though Democrats are in command of both chambers, the impeachment measure ran into immediate trouble.

Senate leaders immediately assigned Senate Joint Resolution 5 — introduced by Sens. Jerry Ortiz y Pino, D-Albuquerque, and Sen. John Grubesic, D-Santa Fe — to three committee hearings.

That many committee assignments generally is thought of as the kiss of death for legislation. Not only are there three chances to kill a measure before it gets to a floor vote, it also increases the chance that time will run out in the 60-day session before a measure can make it through both chambers.

No Republicans in the Legislature support the memorial, supporters acknowledge.

Read More at the FreeNewMexican

Read Full Resolution (source: Free Market News) 

Rosie Calls for Impeachment

Mission Control wrote this in the late evening:

The Indictment of George W. Bush

Mission Control wrote this in the late evening:

By Nathanael

Impeachment is only a political act with limited consequences that bear one’s ability to retain or hold elected office. The convicted Party (such as the President or Judge or Congressperson) of an Impeachment is still liable and subject to Indictment and prosecution for any criminal acts according to Law.

There is no language in the Constitution or the US Code that requires an impeachment proceeding to come before a criminal indictment or prosecution. Any Constitutional Scholar, retired Assistant US Attorney, Supreme Court Justice, Attorney General, Congressperson or any Court stating such prior constraint is in violation of the Constitution and the Law. No one is above the law, not even the President. The Constitution cannot be altered by statute, a legislative act, a bill passed by Congress and signed by the President or an Executive Order. A valid Article V procedure must be accomplished before the Constitution is lawfully modified.

(more…)

Congress Can Stop Iran Attack

Mission Control wrote this at around evening time:

by Jorge Hirsch

However, Congress could pass a law making a nuclear attack on a non-nuclear nation in the absence of Congressional authorization illegal. In so doing, Congress would effectively be preventing Bush from launching any attack against Iran without its authorization, thus reclaiming its broader constitutionally assigned duties. Because Bush will not dare putting 150,000 American lives in Iraq at risk of Iranian retaliation without having the nuclear option on the table. By removing the nuclear option from the Bush toolkit, Congress would be forcefully imposing its will and that of the American people on an administration gone mad.

If Congress chooses not to face the fact that US military action against Iran is likely to lead to the first US use of nuclear weapons since Nagasaki, each one of its members will share responsibility for the nefarious chain of events that is likely to follow, and should be preparing to face his/her very own nuclear Nuremberg trial.

Read More at antiwar.com 

New Mexico Gets Impeachment Bill

Mission Control wrote this at around evening time:

by Kagro X

The transmission of charges from a state legislature must still be memorialized on the floor of the House by a Member. But if, acting on the instructions of his or her home state legislature, a Member of the House does in fact raise a direct proposition to impeach, the matter is highly privileged, “and at once supersedes business otherwise in order.” It would, under the rules, be entitled to one hour of debate, after which it would be subject to a motion to table, or send to committee for further investigation (or, alternatively, death). But if the charges are carried to the floor by a Member of the House, impeachment is the order of the day. Or at least the hour.

Last year’s discussion of the procedure led to the adoption of local resolutions in dozens of locations across the country, and ultimately the introduction of bills in the legislatures of four states: Illinois, California, Vermontand Minnesota (where it was introduced by then state-Rep., now Congressman, Keith Ellison).

For consideration of the political implications of bringing such a resolution to the floor, I refer you to the above-linked diary on the subject. At the moment, the focus needs to be on this:

State Senator Gerald Ortiz y Pino (D-Albuquerque), along with cosponsor John Grubesic (D-Santa Fe) will be introducing such an impeachment resolution when the 2007 session of the New Mexico Legislature convenes next week.

Read More at Daily Kos

A Conservative for Impeachment

Mission Control wrote this at around evening time:

By Brian Gilmore

Bruce Fein reminds me of Jerry Lewis playing Professor Julius Kelp in the 1963 comedy classic The Nutty Professor. Intellectually astute and quick-witted, Fein, like Lewis as Kelp, is underestimated because of his peculiar style.

But the stakes are too high to dismiss Fein simply for being didactic or eccentric. In fact, he’s breaking conservative rank to defend our Constitution.

Fein has a solid Republican résumé. He served as an associate deputy attorney general in the Reagan Administration, where he helped formulate conservative arguments on key legal issues that are still current today. He had stints as a resident scholar at the Heritage Foundation and an adjunct scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. He also writes a regular column for The Washington Times newspaper, one of the country’s leading conservative dailies.

But his bona fides don’t end there.

Read More at The Progressive 

Forget Impeachment, Bring in a Psychotherapist

Mission Control wrote this in the late evening:

By James T. Moore

George W. Bush sorely needs help, and quickly, in several distinct areas of mental deviation. I don’t say this maliciously or vengefully, but neither do I say it lightly. Each day, by a personal appearance, a decision, or a speech Bush reveals again that he is losing control of his mental machinery, notwithstanding his schoolboy grin, his I’m-in-command posture, and his pseudo-soldier demeanor.

The President, as if it were difficult to notice, is suffering, unfortunately, from a self-inflicted amalgum of emotional sicknesses: including self-denial, bogus reality, unhealthy egocentricity, visions of omnipotence, and dangerous delusions—as when he claims God speaks to him.

Although several prominent and well-respected psychiatrists have written reports about Bush’s condition—from treating identical symptoms in hundreds of similar personalities—one hardly needs a doctorate in psychology to recognize that something is wrong, not only with Bush’s bizarre thinking, but with the decisions he makes based on that thinking.

Bush Unconsciously Rejects the Truth.

It is not just Bush’s inability to TELL the difference between truth and lies (right and wrong) it is his inability to KNOW the difference between the two. And therein lies a legal (though not necessarily clinical) definition of insanity. But even if he could bring the truth up into his consciousness— he would not, because exposing it might, in effect, end his Presidency and perhaps even destroy the man himself.

This unique mental affliction is present to some degree in most people, and is harmful only in a superficial sense. But when the President of the United States has this psychological illness it affects millions of people, as well as the nation, which makes it especially dangerous.

Bush Cannot Accept His Fallibility.

Read More at NewsByUs

Another Vermont Petition Circulates

Mission Control wrote this in the wee hours:

by Mike Gleason

SHAFTSBURY — Residents are using a staple of small New England towns to achieve a national goal.Andrew Schoerke and others are trying to get the issue of impeaching President Bush considered at the annual town meeting this March. A petition to this effect has already been started.

This effort echoes a move made last year by Vermont towns to call for Bush’s impeachment.

“The idea originated last year, when five communities included a resolution in their town meeting agenda for impeachment,” Schoerke said. “There are now over 48 towns in Vermont where they’re trying to get a similar resolution considered.”

The towns involved last year were Newfane, Brookfield, Dummerston, Putney and Marlboro. The Bennington County Democratic Committee unanimously passed a resolution to have the state legislature support impeachment as well.

Read More at The Bennington Banner

Accountability and Revolution

Mission Control wrote this in the early morning:

by Neerav B. Trivedi

For the last six years, President Bush and his Republican Party have run rampart over our Constitution – using it to violate our Constitutional rights as American citizens, commit ordinary, as well as political crimes, and start and perpetuate wars based not only on lies and manipulated intelligence, but based on greed, oil, and world domination (in the false guise of “spreading democracy in the world”), resulting in tremendous chaos, as well as rampart death and destruction. President Bush and his Administration still invoke the September 11th terrorist attacks to justify the so-called “war on terror”, which has all but failed, as the main culprit of the September 11th terrorist attacks – Osama bin Laden, is still alive, with his henchmen, plotting the next move against the American people, and their interests, while laughing at our innumerable failures. President Bush and his Administration used and abused the patriotic fervor, present after the September 11th terrorist attacks to violate the Constitution, the Geneva Conventions, and to go to war against a sovereign nation, which neither had anything to do with the September 11th terrorist attacks, no had any of the so-called “Weapons of Mass Destruction” (WMDs), which essentially distracted us from the real purpose of this “global war on terror”, which is to get the real perpetrators of the September 11th terrorist attacks – Osama bin Laden and his henchmen. Instead of catch these perpetrators, we instead go to war in both Afghanistan and Iraq to build “puppet governments”, used as stepping stones to more greed, oil, and both socio-economic, as well as political power, in the Middle East.

Read More at TPMCafe.com

An Impeachable President

Mission Control wrote this terribly early in the morning:

by Sergey Strokan

Is Bush’s impeachment realistic? Several years ago, after the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Congress tried to begin impeachment proceedings against Bush’s predecessor Bill Clinton. But even as the Republicans tried to unseat him and the press fanned the flames of scandal, the American public never understood what the president did that was so bad. In the November 1998 elections that they expected to win thanks to Lewinsky, the Republicans lost. Average Americans still liked Clinton. And then passions died down fast, and the new Congress rejected impeachment, allowing Clinton to finish out his term in peace.

Bush’s rating continues to fall, however, placing him in a different situation. America is paying for his geopolitical mistakes with daily bloodshed and huge monetary outlays. This is no melodrama with female aides in the pages of the yellow press. Potential 2008 presidential candidate Joseph Biden sounded convincing when he warned Republicans that supporting the president’s new plan will be political suicide. The case of Iraq differs from the Monica story, and Bush will have much more trouble shaking off its consequences.

Read More at Kommersant-Moscow

Impeachment … Which Way to Albuquerque?

Mission Control wrote this in the wee hours:

source: KRQE News 13

The 60-session of the state Legislature convenes today with the agenda including cockfighting, water, minimum wages and a call for the impeachment of President Bush and his vice president.The session opens at noon with Gov. Bill Richardson delivering his State of the State speech soon thereafter.

Lawmakers won’t finish up until mid-March.

Richardson has already dubbed this the “year of water” with money for water projects statewide.

With 60-days to deliberate there will be a lot served up on the lawmakers’ table.

When time ran out on last year’s 30-day session, a lot was left on the table unsettled.

Lawmakers say you can expect to see those items again this year.

That includes raising the state minimum wage to $7.50 an hour over a two-year period similar to what Albuquerque and Santa Fe have already done.

Also on the agenda:

*  A 7-percent-plus raise for teachers costing about $69 million.

*  Health insurance for low-income working New Mexicans; $77 million.

*  $100 million-plus for water with money for long-term plans to deal with drought.

*  An attempt to ban cockfighting again ruffling feathers although this time the effort has Richardson’s backing.

Sixty days also allows lawmakers more opportunity to present pet projects and platforms like the resolution asking congress to begin investigation and impeachment proceedings against President Bush and Vice President Cheney.

Read More at KRQE.com 

Watch Local Coverage