'?> mission:impeachable

Rove May Have to Answer Questions

Mission Control wrote this late at night:

by Mike Sheehan

President Bush’s top political consultant, Karl Rove, could testify in the much-publicized trial of I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Michael Isikoff reports in a Newsweek web exclusive.

“White House anxiety is mounting over the prospect that top officials–including deputy chief of staff Karl Rove and counselor Dan Bartlett–may be forced to provide potentially awkward testimony in the perjury and obstruction trial” of Libby, writes Isikoff.

Rove and Bartlett have both already received subpoenas from defense lawyers for Libby, Isikoff quotes lawyers related to the case as saying.

The article states that while it’s not guaranteed that Rove and Bartlett will be called, chances rose this week after Libby’s lawyer “laid out a defense resting on the idea that his client … had been made a ’scapegoat’ to protect Rove.”

Read More at Raw Story and Newsweek

Rosie Calls for Impeachment

Mission Control wrote this in the late evening:

Democrats “Surge” in Response

Mission Control wrote this in the early evening:

Sen. Jim Webb handles the response to Bush’s State of the Union Address. “The (American) Middle Class … is losing its place at the table ….”

BUSH ESCALATES CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IN UNION SPEECH

Mission Control wrote this in the late afternoon:

by David E. Sanger and Jim Rutenberg, New York Times

It was a speech that reflected Mr. Bush’s difficult circumstances. It was limited in ambition and political punch at home, with no proposals to rival his call two years ago to remake Social Security, no mention of rebuilding New Orleans and no allusions to limiting stem cell research or banning gay marriage.

And when it came to his plan to send additional troops to Iraq, he was forced to plead with the Democrats who now control Congress — and with a growing number of Republican critics — to “give it a chance to work.”

In an admission that the United States now finds itself trapped in the cross-fire of a sectarian conflict, Mr. Bush said, “This is not the fight we entered in Iraq, but it is the fight we are in.” While he insisted that America could not afford to fail, he also warned the Iraqi government that “our commitment is not open-ended.”

Read More at the NEW YORK TIMES

More Coverage

Bush brought subdued tone to State of Union
New Zealand Herald, New Zealand
By Steve Holland. WASHINGTON - President George W. Bush, bearing the weight of six years in office, down in the polls and under fire from all sides,
Constituents grumble over missing topics
Seattle Post Intelligencer, WA
By JENNIFER LOVEN. AP WRITER. WASHINGTON — On the day after came the grumbling. The White House warned for days ahead of President Bush’s State of the
Bush enters final two years with subdued tone
ABC News
By Steve Holland. Jan 24, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush, bearing the weight of six years in office, down in the polls and under
A night of firsts
Daily Times, Pakistan
WASHINGTON: It was a night of firsts for President George W Bush’s State of the Union address to Congress: a Democratic Congress, a woman seated in the
Constituents grumble over missing topics
Kansas City Star, MO
AP. WASHINGTON - On the day after came the grumbling. The White House warned for days ahead of President Bush’s State of the Union address that changed

DOWNLOAD: State of the Union Speech 2007

America Speaks: Save the Impeachment Debate

Mission Control wrote this at around evening time:

by Diana Peterlin
Santa Rosa, CA

It has been argued that impeachment is a distraction. President Bush’s actions undermine our entire system of government - that must be fixed before we get back to the daily business of governing.

If the president is not impeached for his actions, this will set a precedent that allows future presidents to start wars at will, torture prisoners, wiretap citizens without warrants and suspend habeas corpus. We must act now to prevent that from happening again in the future.

Members of Congress take an oath of office promising that they will defend the Constitution from “enemies both foreign and domestic.” This is their primary duty. When the Constitution is safe, then they have the luxury to attend to other matters.

Read More at the Vallejo Times-Herald

Hagel: This is Not a Monarchy

Mission Control wrote this in the wee hours:

by David Edwards and Mike Sheehan

On CNN’s ‘Situation Room,’ Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE), who has joined key Democratic senators on a resolution to stop the Iraq troop ’surge’ being pushed by the Bush administration, tells host Wolf Blitzer that “a bipartisan consensus” was needed for Iraq policy to succeed. The bill he co-sponsored was called a “slap at the president” by Blitzer.

“The best interests of our country” are not served by American escalation in Iraq, Hagel explained. He said that America cannot just pull out, and “a few more years” would be required before the US withdrew. But he added that more Americans must not be “thrown in” to Iraq, and the Iraqis should deal with the problem themselves.

He also sought to remind the president that the Congress is a co-equal branch of government, “this is not a monarchy,” and that on “November 7th, the people changed the management” in Congress. The bill Hagel was now getting behind “is just the beginning,” the Vietnam Veteran senator pledged.

Read More at Raw Story

Moyers Rips Big Media

Mission Control wrote this in the wee hours:

source: Democracy Now

The veteran broadcast journalist Bill Moyers spoke on Friday before 3,500 at the opening of the National Conference on Media Reform in Memphis. He announced his return to the airwaves and outlined his vision of media reform. “As ownership gets more and more concentrated, fewer and fewer independent sources of information have survived in the marketplace; and those few significant alternatives that do survive, such as PBS and NPR, are under growing financial and political pressure to reduce critical news content and to shift their focus in a mainstream direction, which means being more attentive to establishment views than to the bleak realities of powerlessness that shape the lives of ordinary people.”

Thirty five hundred activists, journalists and concerned citizens gathered in Memphis, Tennessee this weekend for the third National Conference on Media Reform. Speakers called for the preservation of a free and open Internet, the end of media consolidation and a more democratic and diverse media system.

Read More at Melbourne Indymedia

Impeach Disney and General Electric

Mission Control wrote this in the wee hours:

by David Swanson

By any serious standard of journalism, impeachment should be in the news right now. This illustrates the worst problem with our media. It’s not how they cover stories. It’s how they do not cover stories.

A Newsweek poll a while back said that 51 percent of Americans want Bush impeached and 44 percent do not. That’s about double the support there was for impeaching Clinton when it was in the news every single day.

Dozens of cities have passed resolutions for impeachment. State legislatures have introduced the same. One outgoing congresswoman introduced articles of impeachment in December. Dozens of scholars have written books advocating for impeachment. There are DVDs, forums, marches, rallies, protests. A week ago, we packed a huge ballroom for an impeachment forum, and to make it easy, it was the ballroom in the National Press Club. The media couldn’t make the elevator trip to be there.

And of course, the evidence of impeachable offenses is clear and overwhelming, but rarely presented in the media.

The number one reason that Congress members and their staff tell you in private that they are not yet impeaching is fear of the media. The number two reason is fear of Nancy Pelosi.

The number one reason that well-meaning citizens tell you they don’t want impeachment consists of a PR strategy. People want to present an image that does not include what the corporate media says impeachment is. It is a long journey to move from seeing this as smart and strategic to seeing it as a self-defeating surrender to the corporate media.

And the independent media isn’t where it needs to be either. In part, this is because it tends to retell corporate stories in a more honest way, rather than telling stories that have been untold.

Read More at Political Affairs Magazine

Impeachment Effort Reaches Mainstream Media (Whew!)

Mission Control wrote this in the late evening:

By Ann Compton

Be careful what you wish for. Several Washington residents who went on record at the June 15 Board of Selectmen meeting, the first skirmish on petitioning efforts of a local grass roots group for a special town meeting to discuss the impeachment of President George W. Bush, said the last thing they wanted was to see their little town on CNN or all over the news.

Read More at Voices News

911 Truth Hit Piece Falls Flat

Mission Control wrote this in the late afternoon:

(Editor’s Note: WorldNetDaily.com was forced to issue a retraction to the baseless claims by Neo-Con Hack Jon Moseley.)

By James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.

“9/11 Bush bashers” by Jon Moseley (WND, Aug. 16), alas, is reprehensible and irresponsible in almost every respect. He abuses language and logic and attempts to smear me without justification in an apparent effort to mislead the public from appreciating the objective and scientific findings about the events of 9/11 that have been established by Scholars for 9/11 Truth, an organization that I founded and co-chair with Steve Jones, a physicist from BYU, who has done extensive studies of how the Twin Towers were in fact destroyed.

Moseley has been fanatical, even obsessive, about posting attacks upon members of Scholars. To verify my impression, I did a search on recent Moseley posts.

On Aug. 15, 2006, for example, he posted 15 attacks. On Aug. 1, 2006, 22. July 23, 2006, there were 19. He would post attacks and post again immediately after any response in a style that was immature and juvenile. Had they advanced serious arguments about our findings, they might have been justified in spite of that, but they committed elementary fallacies that made them virtually worthless.

Read More at WorldNetDaily.com

The retraction reads as follows:

Editor’s note, Aug. 17, 2006: In paragraph four of this column, the author makes an assertion about professor Steven Jones’ remarks at a 9/11 symposium broadcast by C-SPAN. A review of the program online evidenced no such comments by Jones.

San Francisco Bay Guardian: Vote to Impeach, So There!

Mission Control wrote this in the wee hours:

source: The San Francisco Bay Guardian Online

EDITORIAL Mainstream media reporters and pundits, as well as our cynical colleagues at the SF Weekly and the rest of their corporate alt-weekly chain, love to bash the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and the city councils of other Bay Area cities for passing resolutions on big questions like war, human rights, or impeachment.

We don’t share that view. Resolutions take almost no time or effort to pass, yet they are important barometers of popular political sentiment, tools that are particularly important given how both major political parties have shown more willingness to listen to their corporate backers than their lowly constituents. People need avenues to make their voices heard without the filters imposed by the leadership of the Democratic and Republican parties.

That’s why we’re happy that citizens in both San Francisco and Berkeley will get a chance to vote this November on the question of whether Congress should initiate impeachment proceedings against President George Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney for their many high crimes: fraudulently leading the United States into war, illegally spying on Americans, torturing enemies, claiming unconstitutional executive power, violating binding treaties, and engaging in war crimes and profiteering, among others.

Read More at the San Francisco Bay Guardian Online 

Pittsburgh Newspaper: Bush’s Signing Statements are Unconstitutional

Mission Control wrote this in the early afternoon:

Editorial, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Perhaps the most notorious example, cited by several speakers, was last year’s legislation that prohibited the White House and all its branches from using torture in interrogating detainees. Guided by the moral authority of Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona, who was tortured himself as a POW in North Vietnam, Congress resisted Vice President Dick Cheney’s cold-blooded advocacy of allowing the torture of prisoners.

In the face of this opposition, President Bush finally came around to the decent position. But no sooner had the applause faded than he signed the legislation with a statement that suggests he will do what he likes.

The president — any president — takes an oath to uphold the Constitution, and signing statements concerning legislation a president deems unconstitutional betray that obligation. This is despite the fact that a constitutionally approved remedy for suspect legislation is readily at hand — the presidential veto. The extraordinary thing about Mr. Bush is that he has never exercised the veto. Not once.

President Bush has made much of his desire for judges who will respect the law and the Constitution — and yet he doesn’t do it himself. Indeed, those future historians will have much to consider about these times, and part of that may be not only how Americans lost their sense of well-being after 9/11 but also how a president used those attacks to become more like an emperor.

Read More at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The Media Ignores Calls for Impeachment

Mission Control wrote this in the early evening:

By Peter Phillips

If a national movement calling for the impeachment of the president is rapidly emerging and the corporate media are not covering it, is there really a national movement for the impeachment of the president?

Read More at The Pasadena Weekly